Author: Revc, Golden Finance

As an emerging financial instrument, crypto-assets have to have Analysis in historical background environment. In the past 75 years of global history, interest groups after World War II often ignored the importance of civil rights and personal wealth in order to maintain the continuity and legitimacy of their own rule. This phenomenon has been reflected in many global events, and the emergence of cryptoassets can be seen as a challenge to this state of affairs. They provide a decentralized way to store and trade wealth, which in theory can reduce the possibility of personal wealth being controlled by a central authority. One of the original design intentions of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies was to create a financial system that did not rely on the central banking system, thereby reducing the ability to directly intervene in the economy.

Additionally, the global and border-agnostic nature of crypto-assets provides a potential tool that can help circumvent power-driven economic sanctions and financial control. For example, in some countries where economic sanctions are severe, citizens may turn to cryptocurrencies to maintain continuity and privacy in financial activities.

However, cryptoassets are not without controversy. The extreme volatility of its value and regulatory uncertainty have called it into question as a stable method of asset storage. Crypto-assets may be used for illegal transactions due to their anonymous nature, which increases the difficulty of supervision and makes the integration of cryptocurrency into the traditional financial system challenging.

When considering the future development of crypto assets, we need to realize that this is not only a matter of technological progress, but also a reflection of changes in the global economic structure. As technology develops and situations change, cryptoassets may play an increasingly important role in the global economy, especially in improving financial inclusion and protecting asset security. And it is realized through party games such as this US election.

Trump and the American Red Neck Group: The break between globalization and grassroots interests and legal challenges

Trump's loyal supporters, especially the "red necks" in the United States Neck" group has long felt that they have been ignored by the American elite. In the implementation of the globalization strategy, these grassroots people have paid a huge price for US globalization and military intervention, but their interests have not been rewarded accordingly.

The plight of red-neck groups in the United States and the conflict with globalization

The term "red-neck" a term usually referring to the white working class people of the southern and rural areas of the United States. Although the term has a derogatory connotation, many people also regard it as a status symbol. Rednecks often hold a conservative stance, are full of suspicion of politics and elites, and are averse to globalization and multiculturalism. They usually face problems such as low education levels, limited employment opportunities, and insufficient social welfare. They live in the fluctuations of the global economy, but fail to obtain sufficient benefits from globalization.

The United States’ overseas strategy includes military intervention, diplomacy and economic sanctions, etc., aiming to maintain or expand the United States’ global influence. However, from the perspective of the redneck community, these strategies are more about supporting the interests of the elite than the grassroots. Multinational companies such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook, as well as military-industrial enterprises such as Lockheed Martin and Boeing, have gained huge market shares and huge profits with the help of the United States' global strategy. These strategies further marginalize rednecks by providing substantial returns to elites by expanding global markets, collecting data, and promoting military needs.

The disconnect between red-neck groups and globalization strategies

For these groups, the United States ’s overseas strategy means that their taxes and the rewards they may receive for sacrificing loved ones, such as those serving in the military, do not flow directly into their communities. Instead, what they saw was the closure of local factories, the outflow of job opportunities, and the skewing of resources. Resources in infrastructure, education, medical care and other fields should be used to improve people's livelihood, but were allocated to projects that support global strategies. This disconnect of interests has caused red-neck groups to have distrust of the United States, a strong aversion to globalization and internationalism, and then support populism and protectionism, especially Trump’s “America First”.

Trump’s legal challenges and struggles

At the same time, Trump is Facing a series of legal challenges, involving multiple fields, including hush money cases, confidential documents cases, election interference cases, etc. These cases not only have a major impact on Trump's personal life and life, but also have a profound impact on American law and structure. In these cases, Trump has tried to delay the legal process and buy more time through defensive strategies such as delaying trials, challenging presidential immunity, and shaping public opinion.

The background and impact of the cases

These cases have been widely interpreted as an attack on Trump Persecution has also become part of the opposition in the United States. Republicans view the cases as an attempt by Democrats to weaken Trump, whileDemocrats view the cases as necessary accountability for Trump's misconduct. These cases not only test the boundaries of presidential immunity but may also set legal precedents for future presidential responsibilities, impact public trust in the rule of law, and shape voter attitudes.

Trump's legal battle not only affects his personal destiny, but also lays the foundation for how future presidents and high-profile figures will be held legally accountable. How these cases are handled will directly affect public trust in the judicial system and have a profound impact on future elections. At the same time, these cases also provide new models for how to balance the relationship with the law and shape the public's legal expectations for characters' behavior.

Trump and America’s Polarization: Legal Controversies, Partisan Loyalties and Cultural Clash

Donald Trump’s career and the legal challenges he faces reveal what America has to offer The complex interactions between society, culture, and human nature. His case highlights the depth of polarization and tolerance of legal and moral controversy in American society, especially when shaped by partisan loyalties and cultural media. The rift between Trump’s supporters and opponents also provides an important perspective for us to understand the current political and social dynamics in the United States.

Polarization and partisan loyalty

Trump’s legal and moral controversies have polarized America The concentrated expression of differentiation. In these disputes, the Republican base often views Trump's legal battles as attacks by his opponents rather than real legal or ethical issues. This reflects the powerful role of partisan loyalty, which often trumps personal behavior or legal consequences in highly polarized environments. For Trump's supporters, no matter how much controversy he faces, partisan loyalty leads them to view these issues as extensions of means rather than necessary legal and moral examinations.

Cultural and media influence

With the rise of partisan media, the public’s vision is becoming increasingly The more they are restricted to the news sources they identify with, creating an echo chamber effect. In this environment, Trump's scandals have been downplayed or interpreted as revenge by some media, which has caused many supporters to turn a blind eye to his personal problems and even regard his anti-establishment image as a rebellion out of touch with tradition. Trump's success has attracted voters disillusioned with tradition, a group that often ignores Trump's personal and legal problems and instead focuses on the change he represents.

Empathy and legal norms

Trump's supporters have broad empathy for his status as an "outsider" and the "injustice" he feels, an emotion that transcends concerns about legal norms. In American society, the public Flexible legal interpretations are often adopted for the actions of figures, especially when those figures serve their cultural or economic interests. This tolerance may lead to a looser interpretation of Trump's actions and reflect the emotional identification and emotional differences of some American voters. A complex balance of legal provisions

Trump’s re-election and social impact

Trump’s re-election proves society’s tolerance for change and redemption. Trump’s journey Challenging traditional notions of leadership and demonstrating that even a controversial figure can succeed within America's democratic system, Trump's reelection is more than just a personal victory, it symbolizes the inclusivity of the American system and shows that even There are huge divisions, and societies are still able to choose leaders through democratic processes

Tom Hanks, Obama and ideological reflection

Public figures with huge cultural influence such as Tom Hanks and Barack Obama , tend to criticize Trump's leadership style and emphasize the values ​​of etiquette, morality and traditional leadership. These contrasts reveal the deep ideological differences between liberalism and conservatism. Liberals may not fully understand Trump supporters. sentiment, and Trump's success reflects many people's critique of elitism and alienation from liberal cultural icons.

Inclusive systems and social balance

The American system allows for a wide range of ideological expression through its inclusiveness, which is also An important force for social stability. Trump's re-election may be seen as a symbol of the health of the system - even controversial leaders can be elected through democratic processes, showing that even in the midst of turmoil, The system can still maintain basic social order. However, this inclusiveness also brings challenges, especially in weakening democratic norms and social cohesion, and may exacerbate the divisions in American society.

These complex, cultural, and legal dynamics have profoundly affected Trump’s career and shaped his long-term influence in American society. They are not only reflected in political aspects, but are also deeply rooted in all aspects of culture and society. Aspects.

Trump’s Inaugural Speech: Reshaping, Regulation and Democratic Rights

Trump’s inaugural speech focused on governance, justice and social valuesA series of themes highlighted the commitment to reinventing and restoring the American system. The following are core ideas related to "Regulation, Privacy, Justice and Democratic Rights":

Justice and Reform

Trump pledged to end the weaponization of the Justice Department and agencies, arguing they have been used in the past to target perceived injustice or corruption. The goal he proposed is to rebalance justice and return to the practice of fairness, eliminate abuse of power, and ensure judicial independence and administrative transparency.

Democratic rights

Trump emphasized returning faith, wealth, democracy and freedom to People, committed to restoring the rights and voices of citizens through a shift to more democratic governance. He said he would give priority to the people's demands, promote a more democratic environment, and ensure response to public needs.

Regulatory and privacy issues

Although specific details were not listed in the speech, from their In the context, it can be speculated that Trump intends to restructure the current regulatory system, especially in terms of security and border control. This change may be achieved by declaring a state of emergency and adjusting immigration laws to re-examine the issues that may affect privacy and ensure that regulations balance the interests of citizens with the privacy of citizens.

Rebuilding trust and transparency

Trump acknowledged that there is a crisis of confidence and expressed Intent to restore administrative integrity and competence. He pledged to take steps to increase the government's transparency and ensure that public trust in the government's institutions is restored while strengthening government accountability.

Overall, Trump's speech reflected an intention to significantly change the approach and re-examine the balance between regulation, privacy and judicial and democratic rights. Better align with people’s values ​​and needs. Such reforms aim to restore public trust in the Government while protecting individual rights and freedoms.

The combination of Trump and crypto-assets: a multi-dimensional interpretation of historical background and game

The relationship between Trump and crypto-assets reflects the broader history, economy and Complex interactions at the social level. The following analysis is divided into key sections and explores the background and influencing factors:

Historical background of major Japanese and Korean companies

Japanese large companies: From military industry expansion in World War II to postwar transformation, Japan's large companies such as Mitsubishi and Sumitomo emerged through relationships and post-war economic opportunities and became modern and diversified enterprise.

Big South Korean companies: South Korea's economic miracle, especially the rise of Samsung and Hyundai, has been driven by economic development and international aid that helped lift the country from postwar poverty Towards an economic power.

"Lost 20 Years" and the Plight of Young People

Japan's "Lost 20 Years" "20 years": Since the 1990s, Japan has experienced two decades of economic stagnation. Young people have faced employment difficulties, social mobility has declined, and a large number of "vagrants" and "otakus" have emerged.

South Korea's challenge: Although South Korea does not have a similar "lost 20 years", in recent years, young people have also faced high unemployment, soaring housing prices and worsening work environment, especially in an economy dominated by big business.

Interest Groups and Civil Rights Issues after the War

The Influence of Interest Groups: Post-War , Japan and South Korea's large companies have formed a strong economy and influence, and protect their own interests through close ties with the United States, which sometimes may sacrifice the democratic process or public interests.

Civil rights and wealth inequality: While the economic models of Japan and South Korea promote economic growth, they also exacerbate social inequality, especially in workers’ rights and income distribution. aspect.

The threat of World War III and the global

Global context: Although there is no evidence Global power groups deliberately used the threat of World War III to manipulate the situation, but the geopolitical tensions of the Cold War and post-Cold War did provide some internal affairs with an excuse to strengthen unity.

Economy and interests: The post-globalization economy often favors the wealthy and multinational corporations, and the needs of developing countries and civil rights issues may be ignored.

Problems between U.S. military-industrial enterprises, establishment factions, and multinational Internet companies

Military-industrial enterprises: American RoxyMilitary industrial companies such as De Martin and Boeing have made huge profits through contracts and occupy a prominent position in national defense. This concentration of power leads the military to favor expansionism over diplomatic solutions, which in turn affects social spending.

The influence of the establishment: The establishment usually represents vested interest groups, and the concentration of power may lead to a bias towards protecting the interests of these groups rather than the broad interests of the people, weakening the effectiveness of democracy.

Multinational Internet companies: Technology giants such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook have been criticized due to market monopoly and privacy issues, especially in terms of data collection, content moderation, and The balancing aspect of freedom of expression is controversial.

The role and game of the Democratic Party

And reform: The Democratic Party promotes military industrial enterprises and Supervision of multinational Internet companies, but also facing pressure from inside and outside the party, must find a balance between promoting social justice, economic development and maintaining competitiveness.

Splits within the party and external challenges: The struggle between progressive factions and establishment factions within the Democratic Party and changes in the external environment continue to affect the intensity and direction of implementation within the party.

The combination of Trump and crypto assets

The intersection with the economy: Trump supporters, including some working class people in traditional industries, feel the influence of modern elites Alienation and the injustices of a globalized economy. Therefore, Trump has turned to crypto assets as an anti-establishment tool, winning over many voters who are disillusioned with the existing system, especially in their distrust of the traditional financial system.

Redistribution of wealth and power: Cryptoassets provide Trump with a platform to challenge traditional finance and elites, emphasizing the fight against "Wall Street" and the "establishment" The slogan "Pai" is not only culturally symbolic, but also attempts to promote a new economic model.

To sum up, the combination of Trump and crypto assets is a multi-layered phenomenon. It is not only related to the global historical background and the unequal distribution of the economic system. It is also closely related to the power struggle among interest groups, military industrial enterprises and technology giants in the United States. The role played by the Democratic Party in this process is complex and full of games, including attempts to promote reforms and pressure to maintain the status quo.

The reason why the Democratic Party lost votes: the deep connection between history, system and class struggle

Behind the Democratic Party's loss of votes lies the class system in American history, the continuation of the post-war system, and the contradiction between civil rights and the interests of the working class. The following analyzes the multi-dimensional factors related to the families of previous presidents, the experience of World War II, and U.S. global hegemony, revealing the roots of the current predicament of the Democratic Party.

The presidential family’s relationship with World War II

Franklin D. Roosevelt: During World War II, Roosevelt As President of the United States, he led important wartime decisions and promoted historic events such as the Lend-Lease Act and the founding of the United Nations, which laid the foundation for the shape of the postwar world.

John F. Kennedy: During World War II, Kennedy served in the U.S. Navy and experienced the Pacific Theater, which became an important part of his career.

Barack Obama and Joe Biden: The backgrounds of the two presidents’ families are indirectly related to World War II. Although their immediate relatives did not directly join the military, their families His wartime experiences have become an important part of his personal narrative. Obama demonstrated his understanding of American history and military sacrifice by referring to his grandfather's World War II experience, while Biden reinforced his sympathy for the struggles of the American middle class by describing his father's life difficulties during the Great Depression and World War II.

The relationship between the Democratic Party and the existing system

The Democratic Party prefers to maintain the current dollar system and There are existing structures, especially within the party where there are multiple senior figures who have gained support and success through the existing system. The background of these leaders within the party makes the Democratic Party appear more conservative in execution and find it difficult to break through the traditional framework. These leaders usually came from higher classes and represented interests based on the postwar system.

The connection between global hegemony and Middle East interests

The global hegemonism of the United States, especially in The pursuit of interests in the Middle East has led to turmoil in the Middle East and peace, and indirectly promoted the occurrence of the 9/11 incident. This incident has greatly affected the judicial system of the United States, strengthened the surveillance and control of the United States, and sacrificed civil rights. As a supporter of globalization, while safeguarding global interests, the Democratic Party has failed to effectively protect the economic interests of the people, especially the working class who rely on traditional industries and energy.

The influence of the postwar establishment

The post-war establishment still firmly controls American institutions and ideas, and some leaders within the Democratic Party achieved success through this system. However, as times change, this The constraints of the system are increasingly evident. The Democratic Party's failure to effectively address civil rights issues, especially its neglect of workers in the Rust Belt energy industry and low-income groups, has made this segment of voters feel alienated from the Democratic Party, especially under Trump. Under the influence of anti-establishment figures like Pu

There are many reasons why the Democratic Party lost votes, including its deep connection with the historical class system, its reliance on the existing economic system, and its neglect of traditional working class interests. The elite background during World War II and the postwar system The continuation of the situation has made the Democratic Party often remain conservative in politics and find it difficult to respond to the growing needs of the people. Ultimately, this series of factors has led to the gradual loss of the Democratic Party’s voter base.

The Intersection of Decentralization and Civil Rights: Reflections on Cryptocurrency, Freedom, and Social Structure

The rise of cryptocurrencies and blockchain, and the rise of civil rights The core ideas are deeply connected. The following analysis explores how decentralization aligns with civil rights issues such as privacy protection, financial inclusion, censorship resistance, and democratic decentralization, and how this idea has an impact in current society and structures.

Reduce Control: Protecting Privacy and Freedom

Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin reduce or central bank intervention through decentralized networks, in line with the protection of personal privacy during the civil rights movement and reduce demands for control. The operation of cryptocurrencies allows individuals to conduct economic activities freely without fear of surveillance or currency manipulation, maintaining economic freedom and privacy.

Financial Inclusion: Accessible Financial Services

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) provides new ways to conduct financial transactions for those who have been ignored or excluded in the traditional banking system, such as the unbanked. This is in line with the civil rights movement. The demands for economic rights have enabled more people to participate in the global economy and improved social and economic inclusion.

Resistance to censorship: freedom of speech and Resist oppression

Blockchain technology makes fund transfers less likely to be censored or frozen, especially in times of oppression or economic system.This is particularly important in the case of cuts. The decentralized financial system supports the need for freedom of expression and resistance to oppression, further connecting with the core values ​​of civil rights for free expression and resistance to oppression.

Decentralization: Democracy and Autonomy

Decentralization means no single entity can control entire network, thereby helping to promote a more democratic economic system and less concentration of power. Decentralization supports the concept of balance of power in civil rights and promotes a more equitable and autonomous economic environment.

The attributes of crypto assets and the current status of global society

Decentralization is closely related to personal development rights Relevant, it reflects an idea that opposes the dominance of postwar interest groups and reshapes the economic and social structure. After World War II, in order to maintain the survival and legitimacy of rule, interest groups ignored civil rights and personal wealth, and set standards in all aspects of society that only served GDP, leading to the degradation of social functions and the alienation of the working class. This process has similarities to the results of the "Rat Utopia" experiment.

"Mouse Utopia" experiment: a metaphor for the collapse of social structure

Experimental background and design: John Calhoun's "Mouse Utopia" experiments in the 1960s and 1970s simulated a "perfect" environment with unlimited food and water, but with space as the limiting factor.

Experimental results: As the number of rat groups increases, the social structure collapses, violence, abnormal sexual behavior (gender ambiguity), and reproductive rate decrease (fertility rate decreases) ) and other problems, eventually leading to the collapse of the rat colony and the complete disintegration of social functions. The "beautiful rats" in the experiment represent individualism and self-isolation in society, showing indifference to collective responsibility, leading to the degradation of society as a whole, but this is caused by the operating mechanism of the social environment in which the rats live.

Reflections on the degradation of social functions: Violence, sexual disorder, loss of maternal behavior and other phenomena appeared in the experiment, reflecting the collapse of the social structure and the extremes of individual behavior change.

The current situation of global society and the warning of "rat utopia"

This experiment is a warning The link between excessive population density, artificial regulatory constraints on resources, and the breakdown of social structures. Currently, the global society is experiencing similar pressures, especially when peopleAgainst the background of over-concentration of population, uneven distribution of resources and imbalance of the economic system (the country is rich and the people are poor). To some extent, these problems can be reflected on and alleviated through decentralized technical architecture to support a more democratic and inclusive social system.

Decentralization is not only a technological innovation, it is also a profound reflection on the structure and system of today's society. Through cryptocurrencies and blockchain, decentralization offers new perspectives on personal freedom, privacy protection, financial inclusion, censorship resistance, and democratic governance. This emerging field coincides with the core values ​​of the civil rights movement while also challenging the imbalances in existing social and economic systems.

Summary: Properties and future trends of encrypted assets

The birth and development of encrypted assets have demonstrated its unique positive significance in the complex global and economic context. Although the world is still in the turmoil of class and conflict, and the military situation is full of uncertainty, the trend of civil rights development is irreversible and is reflected on a global scale. In the next four years, advanced civil rights organizations represented by the crypto community are expected to have a profound impact on all aspects of the political, economic, and cultural aspects of the United States. Trump returned to power after gaining support from the crypto community, demonstrating that an inclusive system can promote economic prosperity and better benefit the system. As the pressure on Trump increases, he will become increasingly aware of the importance of the crypto community and may even view it as a key support force.

The unique attributes of crypto assets are integrating with the trend of civil rights development and gradually becoming an important trend in global economic and social change. Although this process has been accompanied by many challenges - such as the arrest of the founder of Silk Road, the sanctions on cryptocurrency mixers, the impact of negative events such as Trump's legal trial, assassination plots and predictions of Musk's persecution - But its development prospects are still bright. These setbacks are not only a manifestation of the conflict between innovation and traditional systems, but also highlight the potential and necessity of crypto assets in promoting decentralization and civil rights protection.