Source: Daoshuo Blockchain

One thing about Saturday’s sharing surprised me.

Because the original Twitter account was blocked, we re-applied for a new account. This is the first time I have used this new account to communicate with you online, so I originally thought that not many students would leave messages and ask questions during this exchange, so my original plan was to share it with you over a longer period of time:

- Possible economic trends in the next 10 to 15 years;

- Possible market trends of my country’s assets under this trend;

- Under this trend, how can individuals allocate and invest assets to hedge various possible risks

Unexpectedly, the number of questions left in the comments exceeded the number of questions left in any previous online exchange.

Therefore, after answering your questions, I could only spend the last half hour sharing with you the above three questions. Because the time is very short, I was unable to expand on many of the logics that would have taken at least two hours or more to explain in detail, so in the last half hour of sharing, I mainly expressed my opinions and conclusions.

In the last half hour of sharing, I said some things more directly. In order to avoid extraneous matters, I deleted all the recordings. I hope you can understand.

But for the first half hour and a half of sharing, I think some topics can be discussed in detail with you in the article.

Many of these topics are about AI agents, and many students left messages asking about the Virtual platform.

I checked the records of WeChat articles. The first time I wrote about Virtual’s website in an article was in the article on October 31st. When I wrote this article, I had no idea about this platform. As I wrote in the article, I just regarded it as an ICO-like platform for financing AI agents.

Previously, I wrote about another project related to AI financing, which is ORA’s IMO. However, after observing for a period of time, IMO has not become popular, so I have gradually lost interest in the application of this financing method in AI. Therefore, when I discovered Virtual, it was just out of curiosity and I introduced it to everyone purely as a knowledge sharing.

But what’s interesting is that among the comments on this article, none of them asked about this project or its tokens. So I was curious:

-Have any readers gone to this platform based on the information in the article?

- If you have read it, do you have any thoughts or feedback? Even negative feedback will do.

I remember it was around 2021. When I introduced the Boring Ape in an article for the first time, some readers posted a message. Although it is negative, it is still feedback.

No matter how hard it is to understand the Virtual project, it is still easier to understand than NFT, right?

Are there any readers going?Take a serious look?

About a month later, in the article on December 2, I devoted an entire article to detailing this exclusive interview with Lianchuang. Because I think many of his thoughts and opinions are very good and in line with my taste.

I always emphasize in my articles that when I look at a project, I first look at the project founder. If the founder of a project passes the test, the project track is acceptable, and the strategy is generally suitable, the project is generally worth a lot of money. Attentively paid attention.

So I think the Virtual ecosystem has the potential to gain momentum.

But there is still no feedback or message about this project in the comments of that article.

I am also curious: Has anyone among the readers read the interview carefully this time? If so, does any reader have any thoughts on this project?

The reason why I have this doubt comes from my own experience and lessons.

I wrote in a very early article that it was not the first time I heard about Bitcoin that I recognized its value, so I missed the very early dividends.

But later when everyone still said it was CX, I decided to be cruel and study Bitcoin seriously:

Even if it is CX, I still want to see how it works. CX.

This lesson changed the trajectory of my life.

This incident gave me a great experience/lesson:

In this ecosystem, when I discover something new, no matter whether it is good or bad, I should follow my heart If you are curious, go and find out carefully.

If you understand it, as long as it is not too outrageous, too contrary to the bottom line, or too deviating from your own appetite, you can boldly try it while controlling the risk;

If you understand it, because If you don’t know enough and don’t participate, then there is nothing to regret—after all, you have tried your best;

But if you don’t even understand it, you just treat it as news or If you throw away the news after reading it, you may lose a major opportunity.

So, I often call on everyone in my articles to arouse the curiosity in your heart, to be more curious about the new things in this ecology, and to be more bold in exploring.

Opportunities are often found through curiosity and desire to explore.

Without curiosity and desire to explore, you may not be able to seize the opportunity even if it is right in front of you.