Author: Haotian

After looking at the optimization points of the ELIZA V1 and V2 frameworks, I feel that great progress has been made , especially in terms of unified Agent wallet management, unified message management, improved scalability, etc., there have been significant improvements, but to be honest, ELIZA is currently The framework is still at the optimization level of the basic development architecture, and has not significantly expanded the "imagination space". I personally look forward to the possibility of "commercialization" and "chaining" in the future:

1) A complete set of Agent interoperability protocols, including Agent basic message protocol (format standardization, routing mechanism, status synchronization, etc.), Agent dialogue interaction protocol (multi-Agent dialogue management, context information storage and status synchronization) etc.), Agent Resource sharing mechanism (allocation of computing, storage and other resources), Agent task allocation mechanism (intention understanding, task splitting, progress synchronization, aggregation rules, etc.), Agent identity and permission management (identity authentication, absorption scoring system, permission management mechanism) etc.);

2) A set of Tokenomics token economic protocols, including governance token definition (ai16z or ELIZA?), Agent participant incentive mechanism (Agent Developer incentives, data contribution incentives, computing resource supply rewards, verification node rewards, etc.), Gas economic system (Agent calling fees, Memory storage resource fees, cross-chain operation fees, deflationary burning rules, handling fee allocation mechanism, etc.); p>

In addition to these two core "chaining" necessary components, how to design an Agent similar to the ERC20 standard? Asset circulation management standards, including a set of decentralized storage systems, decentralized verification mechanisms (memory systems, behavioral systems), decentralized resource allocation and incentive mechanisms, etc. are all ELIZA's long-term goals for "chain-based" reform. Questions to think about.

Even if the goal of the ELIZA framework is not chaining, how can it be modularly integrated into the consensus layer of each chain, participate in collaboration in governance and verification, etc. Worth exploring too.

Perhaps only if the "chainable" Roadmap is clear, can EliZA secure the top spot at the EVM level in the AI ​​Agent era. But opportunities and variables are also present in this process.

What will ai16z iterate step by step? Can new frameworks like Arc catch up? Which framework can first have a clear route for the advanced development of chaining? Who can take the lead in finding a viable commercial closed-loop path like Virtual? It’s all about paying attention to the direction of observation. Friends who are concerned about the subsequent evolution and development of the AI ​​Agent framework standards can communicate more.