Author: Sai Ge Source: X, @EvanCrypto17

Sleeping and sleeping for 48 hours, a must-see data collection for Web3 players.

Which VCs have the best vision among so many VCs in Web3? Which VCs invested in projects have the highest yield? Which VCs do ordinary players follow to invest more cost-effectively in the early stage? Which item to choose for masturbation? What are the external VCs? Is the projects invested in foreign VCs greater potential?

and other issues are what we retail investors care about the most, and it is also what players in the primary market (hair-beating party) want to pay attention to the most.

In this article, we use the most intuitive data to speak and reveal the answers to these questions one by one.

All data comes from the Internet disclosure. We screened a total of 65 VCs, including 23 foreign VCs, 34 VCs, and 8 VCs under the exchange.

The result is the best result of VC investment is that the token has entered a large office.

Although we know that some projects are profitable without issuing coins, this is not a game that ordinary players can enter.

So we give the following dimensions as judgment:

Quantity:

VC Total number of investment transactions - project coins - project Binance number - project OKX number - project Coinbase number

Success rate:

Project Binance rate = Binance number / total investment transactions - project Ouyi rate = OKX number / total investment transactions - project Coinbase rate = Coinbase rate = Coinbase Number/Total number of investment transactions

Judgement conditions:

Comprehensive score =2 * Binance rate + 1 * Binance rate + 1 * Binance rate with the largest size, so the weight is 2

Average return rate (ROI) of the project = 15 * Binance rate + 10* Binance rate + 10 * Coinbase rate with the previous investment in Binance average profit 15 times, while the average profit of the Ouyi average profit 10 times, and the average profit of the Coinbase average profit 10 times. The average profit assumption of each project is different. Each item is taken here.

Let's talk about the conclusion first

According to the gap in comprehensive scores, we divide VCs into five levels: T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4. The higher the ranking, the better the VC's vision. We follow these VCs and invest our energy in the primary market and make it more cost-effective.

VC Level:

T0 Level VCs include YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), Continue Captial, IOSG Ventures, Bain Capital

T1 Level VCs include Multicoin, Pantera, 1Confirmation, Smrti Lab, Zonff Partners

T2 Level VCs include Polychain, ParaFi Capital, Dragonfly, Sequoia, Delphi Digital, Electric Capital, Mint Ventures, CoinFund

T3 level VCs include Framework Ventures, NGC Ventures, SNZ Holding, Coinbase Ventures, OKX Ventures, etc.

T4 level VCs include Animoca Brands, GSR, Hashkey Capital, Waterdrip, LD Capital, etc.

regional VC investment output and income ranking:

foreign VC> VC under the exchange> VC

T0 level VCs include YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), Continue Captial, IOSG Ventures, Bain Capital

Comprehensive score >1, average ROI between 8 and 12, we invest our energy in these VCs' early investment projects, and we can basically get big results. The probability of making money with single coin A7 A8 is very high.

Detailed data are shown in the figure

T1 level VCs include Multicoin, Pantera, 1Confirmation, Smrti Lab, and Zonff Partners

The comprehensive score is between 0.7 - 1, and the average ROI is between 6 - 7.5. We devote our energy to these VCs' early investment projects, and the returns are also very good. A6.5 is also a good result. left;">Detailed data is shown in the figure

T2 level VCs include Polychain, ParaFi Capital, Dragonfly, Sequoia, Delphi Digital, Electric Capital, Mint Ventures, CoinFund

Comprehensive score 0.5 -The average ROI is between 0.7 and the average ROI is between 4 and 6. We devoted our energy to these VCs' early investment projects, and the returns are a bit unstable, but we may have the opportunity to try it out. The detailed data is shown in the figure. The T3 level VCs include Framework Ventures, NGC Ventures, SNZ Holding, Coinbase Ventures, OKX Ventures, etc.

The overall score is between 0.3 - 0.5, and the average ROI is between 0.3 - 0.5. 2.5 - 4.5 , we devoted our energy to the projects that we invested in early stage of these VCs, but the returns were a bit unstable and the return rate was not high. The detailed data is shown in the figure.

The comprehensive score is at an average ROI of 0 - 0.3, and the average ROI of 0 - 2.5. We devoted our energy to these VCs. The returns of projects invested in the early stage are not very optimistic and the probability of the above is small. The detailed data is shown in the figure.

The probability of the self-owned enterprises invested in Binance and Ouyi is slightly higher.

Coinbase The probability of the "Yu Sanjia" in the projects invested in the above is similar.

From the data, we found that VCs that we usually hear are very powerful, such as a16z, Coinbase, Dragonfly, Polychain, etc. actually have no reference value for us ordinary people.

The "VC sign" played by some projects may be "piercing" ordinary players.

In fact, in our analysis, the projects that VCs at levels T0 and T1 are what we should really pay attention to and invest in.

The output of foreign VCs is higher than that of VCs, and the output of VC investments under the exchange ranks between the two.

When considering whether a project is worth the early investment, we will look at the levels corresponding to the VCs participating and comprehensively judge the listed data, which is of great reference value for us to compete in the primary market.

Another statement, this article only discusses the output ratio of ordinary players to follow the VC and ranks accordingly. It does not involve the comprehensive strength and other aspects of the companies and brands represented by VCs!