According to Golden Finance, Safe investor Hasu posted on social media that although Bybit was stolen this time because the Safe front-end rather than Bybit infrastructure was hacked, Bybit's infrastructure is not enough to monitor such a simple hacker attack. When the amount of funds transferred is greater than $1 billion, there is no reason not to verify the integrity of the message on the second offline machine. If you blame SAFE instead of Bybit here, you will learn the wrong lesson completely. In response, Wintermute founder wishfulcynic.eth responded that his remarks were somewhat confusing and distorting the facts (gaslight effect). Hasu retorted to his series of comments that evaluating whether Safe was wrong in the incident was a difficult thing to answer (not because he was a Safe investor). Safe provides a solution through a centralized front-end, but should never rely entirely on it. It believes that the biggest problem with Safe is that it has not cooperated with large-scale customers to educate it on security. The invasion of Safe developers’ equipment is also one of the problems, but it is more important to learn from it.